|
As a bird |
|
[005] No doubt, nothing is changed since then.
The issue remains highly sensitive. |
[006] From that case a key fact shall
be pointed out - all her drivers,
maids, others from her circle de-facto
betrayed her - freely they gave
testimonies before the court -
against her. |
|
My personal career path lets me to speak on the issue professionally - such "intruders" constitute serious challenge for the business (Pc. [006]), and a level of clients shall correspond to the level of their privacy covering (Pc. [005]). |
|
|
|
|
The issue of the clients protection is wide-ranging,
should hence be talked in person, but
some its facets can be briefly placed here. Giuffre v. Prince Andrew (1:21-cv-06702) District Court, S.D. New York - http://courtlistener.com/...
And it's not about how to commit
unpunished violence against the women -
it's how to avoid to be identified.
You should agree, indeed, it's
a necessary measure
for politicians, businessmen, who
are in the focus of public attention. |
|
|
|
|
The issue of the clients protection is wide-ranging,
should hence be talked in person, but
some its facets can be briefly placed here. |
|
[009] |
[010] |
|
Another facet - privacy in meeting rooms. Indeed, needless to say, it makes little pleasure to have someone another within this time (Pc. [010]). It's mere an illustration (Pc. [009]), professional equipment shall be being used, to scan the rooms for any maliciuous devices, both video & audio. |